Evaluation of the Og34C filter paper technique in lymphatic filariasis prevalence studies.
Identifieur interne : 002B08 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002B07; suivant : 002B09Evaluation of the Og34C filter paper technique in lymphatic filariasis prevalence studies.
Auteurs : D. Reeve ; W. MelroseSource :
- Lymphology [ 0024-7766 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Adolescent, Adulte, Animaux, Antigènes d'helminthe (sang), Enfant, Enfant d'âge préscolaire, Filariose lymphatique (diagnostic), Filariose lymphatique (épidémiologie), Humains, Jeune adulte, Papouasie - Nouvelle-Guinée (épidémiologie), Prévalence, Sensibilité et spécificité, Test ELISA, Wuchereria bancrofti (immunologie), Études séroépidémiologiques.
- MESH :
- diagnostic : Filariose lymphatique.
- immunologie : Wuchereria bancrofti.
- sang : Antigènes d'helminthe.
- épidémiologie : Filariose lymphatique, Papouasie - Nouvelle-Guinée.
- Adolescent, Adulte, Animaux, Enfant, Enfant d'âge préscolaire, Humains, Jeune adulte, Prévalence, Sensibilité et spécificité, Test ELISA, Études séroépidémiologiques.
- Wicri :
- geographic : Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Antigens, Helminth (blood), Child, Child, Preschool, Elephantiasis, Filarial (diagnosis), Elephantiasis, Filarial (epidemiology), Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Papua New Guinea (epidemiology), Prevalence, Sensitivity and Specificity, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Wuchereria bancrofti (immunology), Young Adult.
- MESH :
- chemical , blood : Antigens, Helminth.
- geographic , epidemiology : Papua New Guinea.
- diagnosis : Elephantiasis, Filarial.
- epidemiology : Elephantiasis, Filarial.
- immunology : Wuchereria bancrofti.
- Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Child, Child, Preschool, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Humans, Prevalence, Sensitivity and Specificity, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Young Adult.
Abstract
Currently there are several tests which can be used for monitoring and evaluating lymphatic filariasis prevalence in mass drug administration (MDA) programs with the ICT as most commonly accepted field test. However, other techniques to determine circulating antigen are available that also could be suitable in these programs. Our aim was to determine the suitability of the Og4C3 filter paper technique to determine antigen prevalence for lymphatic filariasis. We compared multiple antigen methods during the course of baseline clinical prevalence studies in Papua, New Guinea in over 800 subjects. We found that the ICT and Og4C3 filter paper techniques and using blood from the ICT card in the Og4C3 ELISA were equivalent in performance and that the serum Og4C3 ELISA test detected significantly more antigenic individuals. In addition, we found that modification of the Og4C3 assay by removing the boiling step did not affect its performance. Our results indicate that the Og4C3 filter paper technique is suitable for use in elimination of transmission of lymphatic filariasis monitoring and evaluation programs, quality control of ICT testing could be accomplished by using blood from the ICT test card, and with appropriate logistics in place, venous sampling and testing by the serum Og4C3 ELISA is achievable in monitoring and evaluation and would better identify areas with low level antigenaemia prevalence and possible ongoing transmission.
PubMed: 25282872
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001277
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001277
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001277
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 006B72
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 006B72
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 006B72
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 002B12
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 002B08
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the Og34C filter paper technique in lymphatic filariasis prevalence studies.</title><author><name sortKey="Reeve, D" sort="Reeve, D" uniqKey="Reeve D" first="D" last="Reeve">D. Reeve</name></author><author><name sortKey="Melrose, W" sort="Melrose, W" uniqKey="Melrose W" first="W" last="Melrose">W. Melrose</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25282872</idno><idno type="pmid">25282872</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001277</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">001277</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001277</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">001277</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001277</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">001277</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">006B72</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">006B72</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">006B72</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0024-7766:2014:Reeve D:evaluation:of:the</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002B12</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002B08</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002B08</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Evaluation of the Og34C filter paper technique in lymphatic filariasis prevalence studies.</title><author><name sortKey="Reeve, D" sort="Reeve, D" uniqKey="Reeve D" first="D" last="Reeve">D. Reeve</name></author><author><name sortKey="Melrose, W" sort="Melrose, W" uniqKey="Melrose W" first="W" last="Melrose">W. Melrose</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Lymphology</title><idno type="ISSN">0024-7766</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Animals</term><term>Antigens, Helminth (blood)</term><term>Child</term><term>Child, Preschool</term><term>Elephantiasis, Filarial (diagnosis)</term><term>Elephantiasis, Filarial (epidemiology)</term><term>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</term><term>Humans</term><term>Papua New Guinea (epidemiology)</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Seroepidemiologic Studies</term><term>Wuchereria bancrofti (immunology)</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Animaux</term><term>Antigènes d'helminthe (sang)</term><term>Enfant</term><term>Enfant d'âge préscolaire</term><term>Filariose lymphatique (diagnostic)</term><term>Filariose lymphatique (épidémiologie)</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Papouasie - Nouvelle-Guinée (épidémiologie)</term><term>Prévalence</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term><term>Test ELISA</term><term>Wuchereria bancrofti (immunologie)</term><term>Études séroépidémiologiques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="blood" xml:lang="en"><term>Antigens, Helminth</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Papua New Guinea</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Elephantiasis, Filarial</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Filariose lymphatique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Elephantiasis, Filarial</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Wuchereria bancrofti</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="immunology" xml:lang="en"><term>Wuchereria bancrofti</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="sang" xml:lang="fr"><term>Antigènes d'helminthe</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Filariose lymphatique</term><term>Papouasie - Nouvelle-Guinée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adult</term><term>Animals</term><term>Child</term><term>Child, Preschool</term><term>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</term><term>Humans</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Sensitivity and Specificity</term><term>Seroepidemiologic Studies</term><term>Young Adult</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Adolescent</term><term>Adulte</term><term>Animaux</term><term>Enfant</term><term>Enfant d'âge préscolaire</term><term>Humains</term><term>Jeune adulte</term><term>Prévalence</term><term>Sensibilité et spécificité</term><term>Test ELISA</term><term>Études séroépidémiologiques</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Currently there are several tests which can be used for monitoring and evaluating lymphatic filariasis prevalence in mass drug administration (MDA) programs with the ICT as most commonly accepted field test. However, other techniques to determine circulating antigen are available that also could be suitable in these programs. Our aim was to determine the suitability of the Og4C3 filter paper technique to determine antigen prevalence for lymphatic filariasis. We compared multiple antigen methods during the course of baseline clinical prevalence studies in Papua, New Guinea in over 800 subjects. We found that the ICT and Og4C3 filter paper techniques and using blood from the ICT card in the Og4C3 ELISA were equivalent in performance and that the serum Og4C3 ELISA test detected significantly more antigenic individuals. In addition, we found that modification of the Og4C3 assay by removing the boiling step did not affect its performance. Our results indicate that the Og4C3 filter paper technique is suitable for use in elimination of transmission of lymphatic filariasis monitoring and evaluation programs, quality control of ICT testing could be accomplished by using blood from the ICT test card, and with appropriate logistics in place, venous sampling and testing by the serum Og4C3 ELISA is achievable in monitoring and evaluation and would better identify areas with low level antigenaemia prevalence and possible ongoing transmission.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Melrose, W" sort="Melrose, W" uniqKey="Melrose W" first="W" last="Melrose">W. Melrose</name><name sortKey="Reeve, D" sort="Reeve, D" uniqKey="Reeve D" first="D" last="Reeve">D. Reeve</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sante/explor/LymphedemaV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002B08 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002B08 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sante
|area= LymphedemaV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25282872
|texte= Evaluation of the Og34C filter paper technique in lymphatic filariasis prevalence studies.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25282872" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LymphedemaV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |